Claim: The EU has “no democratic mandate” from the British people

Summary of the Claim

Before Brexit, Rupert Lowe frequently argued that the European Union had “no democratic mandate” from the British people. His comments suggested that the EU lacked legitimacy in the UK because British voters had not approved its powers, its decision-making structures were undemocratic, and the UK public had no meaningful control over EU institutions.

This fact-check examines how accurate this claim is when assessed against the democratic mechanisms through which the UK participated in the EU, including referendums, elections, and parliamentary scrutiny.

Where the Claim Was Made

Lowe made this argument repeatedly in speeches, interviews and campaign messaging, particularly during the Brexit referendum and in the years following. The framing often implied that:

  • the EU held power over the UK without the consent of British voters
  • the UK had no democratic influence in EU institutions
  • the EU legislative process bypassed British electoral representation

These points go beyond criticism of EU structures and instead assert a complete absence of democratic mandate.

Verdict: ⚠️ Misleading

Criticisms of the EU’s democratic structures are legitimate and widely debated. The EU has complex institutions, shared sovereignty arrangements and indirect executive power, which many argue are less transparent or less accountable than national parliamentary democracy.

However, the claim that the EU had no democratic mandate from the British people is overstated. The UK:

  • held national referendums confirming or rejecting continued membership
  • elected Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) through national, open elections
  • participated in the EU Council and European Council, where UK ministers and Prime Ministers voted on EU laws
  • scrutinised EU legislation through committees in both Houses of Parliament
  • ratified EU treaties democratically through Parliament

Therefore, while the EU’s democratic model is imperfect and open to legitimate critique, the assertion that it had “no mandate” at all is misleading.

Evidence and Analysis

1. The UK explicitly voted on its membership

The UK held two national referendums on whether it should participate in European structures:

1975 Referendum

The British electorate voted 67 percent in favour of remaining in the European Economic Community (EEC). This was a direct, nationwide mandate.

2016 Referendum

The electorate voted 52 percent in favour of leaving the European Union.

The existence of these referendums demonstrates that the British people explicitly granted, renewed or withdrew democratic consent. Saying the EU had no mandate ignores these votes entirely.

2. The UK elected its own MEPs

Between 1979 and 2019, the UK held nine direct European Parliament elections, in which British citizens elected their MEPs to represent them in EU lawmaking. European elections had turnout, candidates, party campaigns and vote counting identical in principle to general elections.

If the EU had “no mandate,” it would imply:

  • these elections carried no democratic weight
  • British voters had no representation
  • British MEPs had no legislative power

All of these assertions are false. The European Parliament could amend, reject or approve major legislation. British MEPs participated fully, chaired committees and shaped laws affecting the entire bloc.

Reform UK itself (formerly the Brexit Party) won the 2019 European elections in the UK—demonstrating the democratic process that Lowe’s claim overlooks.

3. UK ministers voted on EU laws

The Council of the European Union, one of the two lawmaking bodies, consisted of ministers from each member state. UK ministers:

  • voted on regulations and directives
  • negotiated legislation
  • could block or support proposals
  • held the rotating Council Presidency at intervals

These ministers were accountable to the UK Parliament. They could be questioned, criticised or removed through democratic processes.

Describing the EU as having no mandate ignores the UK government’s direct participation in lawmaking.

4. The UK Prime Minister sat on the European Council

The European Council, which sets the EU’s political direction, was composed of elected leaders. The UK Prime Minister:

  • held a seat
  • voted on major decisions
  • signed off on treaties
  • influenced long-term policy
  • negotiated opt-outs (e.g. Schengen, the euro)

The idea that the EU acted without British democratic legitimacy is inconsistent with the UK’s formal place at the top decision-making table.

5. UK Parliament ratified every EU treaty

Each major EU treaty—Maastricht, Amsterdam, Nice, Lisbon—was approved through Acts of Parliament. Treaties only applied to the UK because:

  • the elected House of Commons agreed
  • the House of Lords reviewed and approved
  • the monarch granted Royal Assent

If the EU had no mandate, these parliamentary approvals would have to be ignored. Instead, they demonstrate that EU membership was continuously legitimised through democratic channels.

6. Criticism of EU democratic structures is valid, but does not equal “no mandate”

Scholars frequently discuss:

  • limited power of national parliaments
  • complexity of EU institutions
  • low turnout in EU elections
  • perceived technocratic influence
  • lack of direct public engagement

These criticisms point to democratic deficits, not the absence of democracy.

Lowe’s claim collapses that nuanced debate into an absolute conclusion that does not reflect how British voters and institutions interacted with the EU.

Conclusion

Rupert Lowe’s assertion that the EU had “no democratic mandate” from the British people is misleading. Critiques of the EU’s democratic structure are legitimate, but the evidence shows:

  • British voters endorsed membership in national referendums
  • UK citizens elected MEPs for decades
  • the UK participated directly in EU decision-making at every level
  • Parliament repeatedly approved EU agreements

The EU may have had democratic shortcomings, but the claim that it had no mandate from the British people is factually overstated.

The claim is therefore rated ⚠️ Misleading.

Sources

All sources verified live as of today:

Return to Archive Fact-Checks
Return to Fact Checking Hub